Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le dimanche 30 avril 2006 à 18:09 +0200, Hans de Goede a écrit : >> Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > >>> When I had to choose between nomarch and arc for orphaning, no one stood >>> for arc (nor, for that matter nomarch). So I decided to keep the most >>> recent codebase in the tree. >>> >> Yes its in decent shape, although it does throw 2 warnings about using >> the unscure mktemp function. I think I'll patch those 2 and taken >> ownership of arc. Choice is always good and it doesn't seem a lott of >> work. If it does turn out to be more effort then its worth it it csn be >> orphaned again (not that I'm planning on that). > > arc still got an upstream which is responsive - you can forward patches > to them, they'll release new versions. > > <evil:plan>since arc is taken care of, may I drop nomarch?</evil:plan> > Erm, the idea was to lower the count of orphans, but you're a free man and its a free world. Regards, Hans -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
