Le dimanche 07 mai 2006 à 12:03 -0700, Michael A. Peters a écrit : > On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 13:26 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > > On 5/7/06, Michael A. Peters <mpeters@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > The apache stuff in /var/www probably should be in /usr/share (except > > > the default DocumentRoot root which IMHO should be in /srv/www/html ) > > > > the whole /var/www/ thing has puzzled me as well. It's just a better /home/httpd than the previous one, and is far worse than doing a proper FHS layout > I think we should > > have a partitioned place for web applications. Perhaps just because I > > use a lot of web apps. /usr/share/www/packagename/ seems very > > reasonable to me. > > That's not too unreasonable. As long as you're not doing a simple /home/httpd -> /var/www/ -> /usr/share/www/ The core of the problem is webapp authors choose monolithic filetree deployments for ease-of-development and ease-of-deployment reasons while the FHS mandates split trees for ease-of-administration reasons. And that all the infrastructure which makes pleasing admins not too hard for app authors is severily lacking for webapp authors. ... > personally don't do a lot with web applications (I did in a former > job) - but maybe we need a web app SIG to come to a consensus on how > they should be done, and submit docs to FESCO for approval or rejection, > so that people packaging them can have somewhere to look. You'll probably need more some kind of bottled argument for packagers to forward upstream. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
