On 4/25/06, Brian Pepple <bdpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm well aware that non-active packages are accepted in FE, but does it > make sense to spend time on packaging this, when there is a clear > successor to sodipodi that is actively be developed? I use inkscape pretty much daily at this point to do minor svg manipulation. From a user perspective, I honestly doubt I'd ever need to install sodipodi. There isn't a big toolkit/library difference between the codebases so there's no secondary codebase purity reason associated with the packages either. Sometimes we have to let codebases pass away into the long goodbye and move on. -jef"just as long as oneko never dies"spaleta -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
