> orphaned = maintainable, but with out a maintainer > legacy = unmaintainable and with out a maintainer legacy (use any other better name) could also be unmaintainable in devel branch but with a maintainer. So the package could still be maintained but would not have a devel or a new fc directory in cvs. So it would be a co-maintainership if somebody steps up to maintain it for devel. > If there is also no objection, perhaps we can start a legacy packages > page also, to house unmaintainable packages? You mean unmaintainable in devel? Otherwise it is just orphaned. -- Pat -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
