>>>>> "Jonathan" == Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> writes: Jonathan> On 10/05/06, Jonathan Underwood Jonathan> <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> So - can anyone come up with a better naming scheme than the one >> above? I hope so :) Jonathan> To answer my own question - here's a proposal: I could Jonathan> rename the muse package to emacsen-muse, such that the Jonathan> binary rpms are: Jonathan> emacsen-muse (containing the common stuff, and required by Jonathan> the packages below) emacs-muse xemacs-muse emacs-muse-el Jonathan> xemacsen-muse.el Jonathan> The SRPM would be emacsen-muse, and that would also then be Jonathan> the module name in bugzilla etc. Jonathan> Terrible idea? No, I like that idea. emacsen seems to convey that it works for more than one emacs variant. :) Debian appears to use that in at least one package (emacsen-common), and http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/emacs-en/Emacsen has it defined. Jonathan> Should this be the guideline specific to (x)emacs packages Jonathan> which build for both flavours? I think it should. Would be good to have them all be consistent. Jonathan> If the FESCO could reach a decision on this it would be Jonathan> useful - then I can move the emacs muse package out of the Jonathan> way, and let the packagers of the other two muse programs Jonathan> fight over the vacant namespace :) Sounds good. It didn't get discussed at this weeks meeting, but perhaps one of the FESCO folks could put it up on the adgenda for next week? Jonathan> J kevin
Attachment:
pgpvEjRrY5NY7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
