On 10/05/06, Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So - can anyone come up with a better naming scheme than the one above? I hope so :)
To answer my own question - here's a proposal: I could rename the muse package to emacsen-muse, such that the binary rpms are: emacsen-muse (containing the common stuff, and required by the packages below) emacs-muse xemacs-muse emacs-muse-el xemacsen-muse.el The SRPM would be emacsen-muse, and that would also then be the module name in bugzilla etc. Terrible idea? Should this be the guideline specific to (x)emacs packages which build for both flavours? If the FESCO could reach a decision on this it would be useful - then I can move the emacs muse package out of the way, and let the packagers of the other two muse programs fight over the vacant namespace :) J -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
