On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 11:05 +0200, Eric Tanguy wrote: > Le vendredi 12 mai 2006 à 12:32 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : > > libltdl is from libtool. Seeing as one of the unresolved deps is > > libguile-ltdl something might have changed in the upstream guile that > > needs a change in the guile packaging for Core. Or it could be that > > your package depends on ltdl directly. In either case, a BuildRequires > > for libtool-ltdl-devel will probably get you past this error. > > > > If it is a problem with guile you should file a bug like "guile-devel > > should Require libtool-ltdl-devel". > > > So adding BuildRequires for libtool-ltdl-devel solve the problem and now > the package build fine in mock. My question is : guile have to require > libtool-ltdl or my package have to require it ? > I strongly suspect that guile-devel needs to Requires: libtool-ltdl-devel but I haven't looked at either your package or guile's so I can't be certain. If you only bumped the release of your package (didn't take the opportunity to upgrade to a new upstream) I'd say file a bug against guile. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
