On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 22:41 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > <long reply of Michael to Thorsten snipped> > > Seeing the long list of mostly valid problems Michael brings up and > combining this with my own gut feeling Which i had about this even > before reading Michaels objections I say don't do it. Lets not add all > these extra layers of complexity to the current well working FE "system" +1. I don't feel that any of the supposed benefits of a required testing layer outweigh the pain it will cause. In addition, from my observations (and discussions with others), the testing repo is/was almost never used and even less "tested" by the userbase, in the places where it exists/existed. ~spot -- Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260 Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices) Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my! -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
