On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 10:35 -0700, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote: > Log Message: > new upstream release ...which due to the soname change in it, will break stuff and leave yum users without all updates until they figure out what repo they need to temporarily disable in case they're using ones that have dependent packages. libdirect-0.9.so.24 -> libdirect-0.9.so.25 libdirectfb-0.9.so.24 -> libdirectfb-0.9.so.25 libfusion-0.9.so.24 -> libfusion-0.9.so.25 This is the second consecutive update to directfb which will cause these problems. I've seen no mail about the change on lists that I follow. The packages are built for all repos all the way down to FC-3 (an "EOL"d release). Looks like nothing was learned from the previous directfb mess. *sigh* I'm inclined to move the FE-[345] packages at least temporarily away from the needsign queue so that it can be discussed/explained why the pain is necessary, and if it is, it can be properly announced and people (both packagers and users) can prepare. Objections? -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
