Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 10:35 -0700, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote: > >> Log Message: >> new upstream release > > ...which due to the soname change in it, will break stuff and leave yum > users without all updates until they figure out what repo they need to > temporarily disable in case they're using ones that have dependent > packages. > > libdirect-0.9.so.24 -> libdirect-0.9.so.25 > libdirectfb-0.9.so.24 -> libdirectfb-0.9.so.25 > libfusion-0.9.so.24 -> libfusion-0.9.so.25 > > This is the second consecutive update to directfb which will cause these > problems. I've seen no mail about the change on lists that I follow. > The packages are built for all repos all the way down to FC-3 (an "EOL"d > release). Looks like nothing was learned from the previous directfb > mess. *sigh* > > I'm inclined to move the FE-[345] packages at least temporarily away > from the needsign queue so that it can be discussed/explained why the > pain is necessary, and if it is, it can be properly announced and people > (both packagers and users) can prepare. Objections? > Being the one who caused the directfb disaster the last time *, I say remove them from the need sign queue for now and contact the maintainer about this. This will avoid us all a lot of pain. Not many people actually use directfb, but many have packages installed which can optionally use it and thus depend on it. * A new upstream version was needed to get it to build on devel, there was no package for devel available breaking devel and the maintainer wasn't responding so I jumped the gun (oops). Regards, Hans -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
