>>>>> "Jonathan" == Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Jonathan> OK, FESCO unfortunatley didn't actually seem to reach any
Jonathan> kind of decision on this.
Yes, they did in the meeting just this morning...
The answer seems to be 'emacs-common-muse'
May 18 11:02:33 --- thl has changed the topic to: FESCo Meeting in progess -- emacs-muse
May 18 11:02:37 * bpepple lurking about.
May 18 11:02:41 <thl> {x,}emacs-muse, emacs-comon-muse or emacsen-muse ?
May 18 11:02:50 <thl> do we want to discuss this without spot?
May 18 11:02:56 * spot is here
May 18 11:03:00 <XulChris> +1 emacs-common-muse
May 18 11:03:04 * nirik likes 'emacsen-muse', but it doesn't really matter that much I guess.
May 18 11:03:12 <thl> +1 emacs-common-muse
May 18 11:03:20 <spot> there is no precent for making up words like emacsen in the guidelines to date
May 18 11:03:22 <thl> spot, what's you current solution?
May 18 11:03:29 <spot> and i would prefer not to start anything. :)
May 18 11:03:33 <mschwendt> +1 emacs-common-muse
May 18 11:03:41 <nirik> spot: fair enough.
May 18 11:03:42 <spot> emacs-common-foo is my vote
May 18 11:03:50 <XulChris> +∞ emacs-common-muse
May 18 11:03:51 <bpepple> +1 emacs-common-muse
May 18 11:03:55 <spot> precedent
May 18 11:04:13 <thl> k, seems this one one easy
May 18 11:04:24 <nirik> ok, so muse, mew, and emacs-autex have to change...
Jonathan> So, I have updated the spec to
Jonathan> call the package emacs-muse, with subpackages of
Jonathan> xemacs-muse, emacs-muse-common, emacs-muse-el and
Jonathan> xemacs-muse-el. this is a bit unilateral, but I figured
Jonathan> doing something is better than nothing.
Jonathan> I have also added Obsoletes: muse and Provides: muse to the
Jonathan> muse-common subpackage.
Make sure you have the versions right in there.
Jonathan> I'm all ready to go, but I don't know what the best way to
Jonathan> proceed is - shall I import this as a new package into cvs
Jonathan> (since the package name is now different) and request the
Jonathan> old package is deleted? (surely this won't have to go
Jonathan> through the review process again?)
Yeah, I would think importing the new package and requesting the old
one be removed would be right.
Jonathan> Jonathan.
kevin
Attachment:
pgp7ALi5uzHhB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
