On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 22:34 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > > This also raises the meta question - is it ok for subpackages to have > their own bugzilla entry? I think the answer has to be yes. > > For example, emacs-auctex really should have a subpackage for the > preview latex style files and friends, called tetex-preview, such that > functionality of the latex preview style files is made available for > eg. LyX. This approach is recommended by upstream AUCTeX maintainers. > Clearly, no user could be expected to know that bugs with > tetex-preview should be filed against emacs-auctex. :) While that is a problem - the proper bugzilla entry can be found by looking at the rpm info (which shows the src.rpm that spawned it). There are a boatload of packages with sub packages, and when I asked about this before (components for sub packages) I was very bluntly told "not gonna happen". -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
