Re: check-rpaths

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 20:54 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "p" == paul  <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> p> ERROR 0001: file
> p> '/usr/lib64/gnome-build-1.0/backends/libgbf-mkfile.so.0.0.1'
> p> contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64]
> 
> Some references:
> 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ToshioKuratomi
> 
Rather than my personal page (which is a bit of a rat's nest :-) you can
find more official information here::
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Schedule/RpathCheckBuildsys

That page has a more detailed explanation of the rpath problem in
general.  It includes several workarounds for it when the rpath is being
dragged in by libtool, including the workaround listed on my wiki page.

It doesn't seem to mention the less intrusive measure of %configure
--disable-rpath but that mostly works with applications, not with
libtool-munged library builds.

-Toshio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux