On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 09:01 -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 15:20 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
>
> > > It looks quite free apart from the "as long as ... you do not ... try to
> > > sell it" clause, which I think disqualifies it as free software despite
> > > what the first sentence of the license terms states. Is this OK for
> > > Extras or not?
> >
> > I don't think so.
>
> That counts as a use-restriction license. I say no.
>
> (See if you can get the author to remove the "as long as you do not try
> to sell it" clause)
and probably the "You may alter the code as long as you send me any
diffs" clause as well. Finding out we may not fix bugs because the
author isn't reachable is a not a pleasant thing I say.
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
