On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 17:05 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > On 11/05/06, Tom 'spot' Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 13:18 -0500, Quentin Spencer wrote: > > > > > Do I dare suggest that this might be a place where using an epoch might > > > be justified? > > > > Actually, this would be one of the rare valid cases for epoch. > > Not very friendly from the user perspective though - how is Joe User > supposed to know which epoch refers to which package? Or did I > misunderstand the suggestion? No, the use of epoch here is solely to have the new muse audio application (0.8.1a) show up as "newer" than the old muse emacs plugin (3.02.6b), when the package names change. ~spot -- Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260 Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices) Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my! -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
