On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 04:30:39PM -0700, Michael Thomas wrote: > I found the following clause in the Maelstrom package which is under > re-review after being moved from core to extras. The package is mostly > GPL, but there is the following extra clause in a README file: > > "The artwork and sounds used by Maelstrom are copyright Ambrosia > Software (http://www.ambrosiasw.com) and may not be redistributed > separately from the Maelstrom public GPL release." > > I seem to recall that there was a similar issue with uqm, but I don't > recall the conclusion. > > Is this something that makes incompatible with Fedora's licensing > requirements? It isn't consistent with the GPL which the total package is supposed to be under, so it's an invalid license add-on, or the total package is not GPL. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpGXjjN7KjfK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
