Re: libfoo<major> (was: Incoming: directfb soname problems)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 00:25 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:

> 
> Maybe it's time to think about packaging so into their separate
> libfoo<major> subpackages like Debian/Mandrake/ATrpms are doing? This
> always ensures forward and backward compatibility at the cost of dead
> libfoo<major> packages lying around.

I semi agree.
If a package containing shared libraries is updated, it should not be
too hard to make a compat package, even if it *just* has the older
shared libraries, so that things don't break.

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux