On 19/05/06, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 18.05.2006, 20:33 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Underwood: > OK, FESCO unfortunatley didn't actually seem to reach any kind of > decision on this. Why do you think so? Here is the relevant part from yesterdays meeting (it was the first topic; the summary I send out yesterday was from *last* weeks meeting)
OK, sorry, I thought that was for this weeks meeting. I have to say, I just don't get why people think emacs-common-muse is a useful package name - the common in the package name is superfluous. The common files should be a subpackage of the main package, not the main package, surely? However, if you guys really want this to be the Guideline, I will push ahead with it - but it impacts all emacs packages. The alternative, which I have implemented sticks closer to current guidlines and packaging precedent... please do have a look at the URL I posted for the alternative implementation. Jonathan. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
