Am Donnerstag, den 18.05.2006, 20:33 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Underwood:
> OK, FESCO unfortunatley didn't actually seem to reach any kind of
> decision on this.
Why do you think so? Here is the relevant part from yesterdays meeting
(it was the first topic; the summary I send out yesterday was from
*last* weeks meeting)
> 19:02 --- | thl has changed the topic to: FESCo Meeting in progess -- emacs-muse
> 19:02 * | bpepple lurking about.
> 19:02 < thl> | {x,}emacs-muse, emacs-comon-muse or emacsen-muse ?
> 19:02 < thl> | do we want to discuss this without spot?
> 19:02 * | spot is here
> 19:02 < XulChris> | +1 emacs-common-muse
> 19:02 * | nirik likes 'emacsen-muse', but it doesn't really matter that much I guess.
> 19:03 < thl> | +1 emacs-common-muse
> 19:03 < spot> | there is no precent for making up words like emacsen in the guidelines to date
> 19:03 < thl> | spot, what's you current solution?
> 19:03 < spot> | and i would prefer not to start anything. :)
> 19:03 < mschwendt> | +1 emacs-common-muse
> 19:03 < nirik> | spot: fair enough.
> 19:03 < spot> | emacs-common-foo is my vote
> 19:03 < XulChris> | +∞ emacs-common-muse
> 19:03 < bpepple> | +1 emacs-common-muse
> 19:03 < spot> | precedent
> 19:04 < thl> | k, seems this one one easy
> 19:04 < nirik> | ok, so muse, mew, and emacs-autex have to change...
> 19:04 < thl> | spot, can you mail that to the list and put it in the packaging guidelines please?
> 19:04 < spot> | gladly.
> 19:04 --> | thomasvs (Thomas Vander Stichele) [n=thomas@fedora/thomasvs] has joined #fedora-extras
> 19:04 * | nirik can go review vm now too. ;)
> 19:04 < thl> | spot, thx
CU
thl
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
