On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 01:26 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 16 May 2006 17:01:10 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: > > > On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:13:18PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > > > Hiyas, > > > > > > do I need to add flex and bison as BuildRequires in a spec-file? > > > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRequires does not > > > mention both as exceptions but the suggested configuration on > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/MockTricks includes both. > > > > Both flex and bison are in the standard buildgroups, so they should > > not be listed as explicit BuildRequires in your spec file. > > To be precise, they _need not_ be listed explicitly (see > PackageReviewGuidelines). But it makes sense to list them. > It's certainly kinder to end users to list them, if the end user wants to rebuild the src.rpm with a custom patch or configure option. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
