Re: Trouble with incomplete Binary RPMs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 14 May 2006 21:28:10 +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote:

> On https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191456
> several users complaints, that the FC-4 package of
> stellarium-0.8.0-2 was malform.
> 
> To solve this problem, I have reinitiate a rebuild of this
> package for FC-4.
> 
> Becouse, that was not the first time where a incomplete RPM was
> put into the repository, I want to ask for the reason why this
> may be happen.

I don't know when this happened for the first time. But since the rpm is
truncated and from May 8th, it looks a bit as if it is a victim of an
interrupted push of packages, which should not have been interrupted.

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux