Rex Dieter wrote: > Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > >> On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 11:05 +0200, Eric Tanguy wrote: >>> Le vendredi 12 mai 2006 à 12:32 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : >> >>> > libltdl is from libtool. Seeing as one of the unresolved deps is >>> > libguile-ltdl something might have changed in the upstream guile that >>> > needs a change in the guile packaging for Core. Or it could be that >>> > your package depends on ltdl directly. In either case, a >>> > BuildRequires for libtool-ltdl-devel will probably get you past this >>> > error. >>> > >>> > If it is a problem with guile you should file a bug like "guile-devel >>> > should Require libtool-ltdl-devel". >>> > >>> So adding BuildRequires for libtool-ltdl-devel solve the problem and now >>> the package build fine in mock. My question is : guile have to require >>> libtool-ltdl or my package have to require it ? >>> >> I strongly suspect that guile-devel needs to >> Requires: libtool-ltdl-devel > > guile is one of those guilty packages that include one (or more) dreaded > .la files. > > I'll go file a bug. See "guile-devel deps missing" http://bugzilla.redhat.com/191595 -- Rex -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
