Re: Question about "shlib-with-non-pic-code", possibly caused by assembler code?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Orion Poplawski wrote:
> In the meantime, should this be a blocker against pari being accepted
> into extras?
> 

Non PIC .so's break with SELinux (targeted) being enabled. There is a
work around though, checkout Glide3 in cvs, there is some magick in the
specfile to fix the SELinux issues.

This is not the preferred way to handle this though.

Regards,

Hans

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux