On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 18:15 +0200, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >> So no need to require it in the specfiles. > > It's not listed in > > http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions > > so it should be BuildRequired. > > How should we find out missing buildrequires if not with mock ? (yes, and > fedora-rmdevelrpms). IMHO every package installed by default by mock should > be and exception for BuildReqs (that's what buildreqs are for, btw). Agreed. /B -- Brian Pepple <bdpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
