Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 12:57:56AM -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote:
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 02:01 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
* they are opposed to forks and free redistribution, they want to be
acknowledged for the work and also keep control on it. That also goes
against free software.
That sounds like the very definition of proprietary software to me.
No, because the source is given freely to you and you can modify it as you
like. The restriction is that the source of the software cannot change.
So you can't fix security bugs then?
Paul.
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
