On 23/05/06, Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote:
That's strange. It seems to me that this practice is explicitly taken into account in the point 4. at http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php Accordingly, an open-source license must guarantee that source be readily available, but may require that it be distributed as pristine base sources plus patches. In this way, "unofficial" changes can be made available but readily distinguished from the base source.
Indeed. Seems the wikipedia entry is off beam. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
