On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 15:45 -0400, Warren Togami wrote: > I'm glad that people are talking about possibilities of how to implement > this, but we should step back and first think about what are our goals, > what do we actually want out of this? I think a package database system > would eventually encompass all kinds of information, but initially we > must prioritize implementation of things that we need and dependent data > structures. I copied the information from Warren and Hans into the PackageDatabase page (since it didn't exist yet). I left space for implementation notes at the bottom but didn't fill it as I agree that the "what" is still open enough that the "how" could change drastically. http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Schedule/PackageDatabase -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
