Le samedi 10 juin 2006 à 19:20 +0200, Denis Leroy a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > please don't, we need 0.x to mark release candidates and others > > pre-real-release versions > > I don't understand this one. The release is not the version number, and > it's something that we completely control (unlike the upstream version > number), so should it be anything other that a linearly increasing > single number (just like a build number) ? (I can see an exception being > made for things with kernel versions in them otoh). There is a convention to use 0.x release numbers when you package something which is almost, but not quite the version number the package advertises (fairly common situation nearby a FC release when all sorts of stuff is packaged early in expectation of reaching full release before the actual distro release) -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
