On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 12:35 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > -Release: 6%{?dist}
> > +Release: 6.1%{?dist}
>
> Caution! '1' is larger than 'f', so this release would be seen as newer than
> any fc4, fc5, fc6 release. Avoid a half-hearted release bump like this. Use
> 7%{?dist} or 6%{dist}.1, where the latter is a bit dangerous, too, since when
> built locally with %dist undefined, Joe User ends up with 6.1, which is higher
> than 6.fc6, for instance.
Indeed. Perhaps we should only allow integer release increments? I can
document this in the guidelines...
~spot
--
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
