Le samedi 10 juin 2006 à 10:49 -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway a écrit :
> On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 12:35 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > > -Release: 6%{?dist}
> > > +Release: 6.1%{?dist}
> >
> > Caution! '1' is larger than 'f', so this release would be seen as newer than
> > any fc4, fc5, fc6 release. Avoid a half-hearted release bump like this. Use
> > 7%{?dist} or 6%{dist}.1, where the latter is a bit dangerous, too, since when
> > built locally with %dist undefined, Joe User ends up with 6.1, which is higher
> > than 6.fc6, for instance.
>
> Indeed. Perhaps we should only allow integer release increments? I can
> document this in the guidelines...
please don't, we need 0.x to mark release candidates and others
pre-real-release versions
--
Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
