Re: Hula -- mixed mono package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

> > They don't need to go in there. However, if you have a package which
> > builds on them (for example, MonoDevelop [ 178904 ] needs boo [ 189092 ]
> > amongst others), the configure script may not pick them up correctly. By
> > having them all in /usr/lib, you can be assured that the package will be
> > found. It's not the best way of doing things, but until things become
> > saner with mono and how it's set up and how it looks for things...
> 
> What's the easiest set of packages (preferably two already in Extras but
> I'll look at something under review if there isn't a whole stack of
> dependencies) that shows what the problem is?  

boo, nant and gtksourceview-sharp are all pretty trivial

> Since mono applications
> in Core reside in %{_libdir} and Core's mono libraries only
> put .dll, .exe, and GAC files in %{_prefix}/lib/ (pkgconfig and
> ELF .so's go into %{_libdir}) I think there's something not quite right
> about the wiki's statement of problem and the "%define _libdir
> %{_prefix}/lib" solution.

Not with you there - what do you mean?

(sorry, very late night last night - the baby was restless)

TTFN

Paul
-- 
"Logic, my dear Zoe, is merely the ability to be wrong with authority" -
Dr Who

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux