On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:29:37AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 11:20 -0400, Tom Diehl wrote: > > I suspect that it is harder than you suggest. > > The difficulty there was $OEM did not track things for crap. And the > workspace I had got rm'd and thus went the SRPMs. It would not have > been hard at all if there would have been policy about where to get > those rpm/srpms from, a central repository, CVS tracking, etc... In any company with >1 employee, the liklihood of one person not knowing what another person is doing is high. Intentionally tying actions of one person to the work of a (quite likely) functionally unrelated person is frowned upon. Legally requiring that the sales web site, paper (translated) docs, etc. change whenever a software developer fixes a bug is a sure way to ensure Fedora isn't as widely used as we would like. Thanks, Matt -- Matt Domsch Software Architect Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
