On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 11:37 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: > > In any company with >1 employee, the liklihood of one person not > knowing what another person is doing is high. Intentionally tying > actions of one person to the work of a (quite likely) functionally > unrelated person is frowned upon. Legally requiring that the sales > web site, paper (translated) docs, etc. change whenever a software > developer fixes a bug is a sure way to ensure Fedora isn't as widely > used as we would like. So where do you draw the line on when 'changes' are changes enough to require a name change? Blurring the trademark line is a sure way to lose the trademark, and we do NOT want that to happen. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
