Re: Maintainer sought for lirc-kmod(-common)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 08:03:35PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> I've sat on lirc-kmod(-common) for too long, sorry about that, but I've
> just officially orphaned them.
> 
> More info: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/192621#c1
> 
> The thing is that I'm fine with continuing to maintain the main lirc
> package, but I have no use or hardware for the kernel modules.  And the
> main lirc packages works for many without the modules, so a dependency
> should not be added.  But one the lirc kmods are shipped, we'll need to
> keep them in sync with the main lirc package.  I don't personally think
> that's problematic and thus having a separate maintainer for the modules
> should work ok.  If there is disagreement and volunteers available to
> take care of the whole shebang, I can let go of the main lirc package as
> well though.

I think the two are too much tied to be independently maintained.

> Any takers?

I gladly would, but I need to convince the peers here about kmdl
adoption first :)
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgp1V3HfpSpmM.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux