Hi, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines says that %{name} should use upstreams advertised name and/or tarbal name. But it says nothing about capitalization. I thought that the rule was to always use all lowercase even if upstream does things differently unless there are arguments in favor of sticking to upstreams capitalization? Also on the same page it talks about release candidates versioning and it advices to use the final version this will become as version (agreed) and to use the following as release: 0.%{X}.%{alphatag} so we get: 0.1.rc1 0.2.rc1 0.3.rc2 Where as I have always used and have seen others use (mostly): 0.rc1.1 0.rc1.2 0.rc2.1 Which works fine 2. I understand that there are scenarios where this scheme will break, but in the scenarios where I've used it / seen it used it works fine, and I personally prefer this second scheme. Is it ok to use my own discretion here, both for my own packages and when reviewing? Or should things always be done as: 0.%{X}.%{alphatag} ? Regards, Hans -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
