Hans de Goede wrote: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines says that > %{name} should use upstreams advertised name and/or tarbal name. But it > says nothing about capitalization. I thought that the rule was to always > use all lowercase even if upstream does things differently unless there > are arguments in favor of sticking to upstreams capitalization? I don't think the NamingGuidelines cover capitalization, but I don't think it unreasonable to lowercase everything. > Also on the same page it talks about release candidates versioning and > it advices to use the final version this will become as version (agreed) > and to use the following as release: > 0.%{X}.%{alphatag} > > so we get: > 0.1.rc1 ... > Where as I have always used and have seen others use (mostly): > 0.rc1.1 ... > Is it ok > to use my own discretion here, both for my own packages and when > reviewing? Or should things always be done as: > 0.%{X}.%{alphatag} ? No, yes, respectively. -- Rex -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
