Re: Naming guidelines question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Rex Dieter wrote:
> Hans de Goede wrote:
> 
>> Also on the same page it talks about release candidates versioning and
>> it advices to use the final version this will become as version (agreed)
>> and to use the following as release:
>> 0.%{X}.%{alphatag}
>>
>> so we get:
>> 0.1.rc1
> ...
>> Where as I have always used and have seen others use (mostly):
>> 0.rc1.1
> ...
>> Is it ok
>> to use my own discretion here, both for my own packages and when
>> reviewing? Or should things always be done as:
>> 0.%{X}.%{alphatag} ?
> 
> No, yes, respectively.
> 

Hmm,

shortest answer ever, and that is no, yes because?

Regards,

Hans

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux