On 6/3/06, Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx> wrote:
One warning per such a package isn't exactly an amount of noise that would make it harder to spot other problems, so I'm inclined to leave this as is.
+1 Packagers need to double check the source tarball for any documentation that should go in devel. Keep the rpmlint warning. The fact is rpmlint is going to give warnings all the time on stuff. You just need to know when to ignore them much like any C programmer would ignore warnings from lint. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
