Le Ven 2 juin 2006 16:45, Steven Pritchard a écrit : >> Is there any mechanism for flagging these and saying that unless they're >> fixed in a reasonable amount of time [1], they're up for adoption? > > On releases, sure, but on rawhide? That seems a bit excessive. Because we don't want to test FE for a given FC release at the FC release time? Sure you have more leaway to fix things for devel - that does not mean it's ok to have packages broken for looong times just because it's rawhide. Lowering rawhide support means lowering number of rawhide testers, which in turn makes FCt releases less testable, and the vicious circle can spin up till FC release itself is half-baked at release time. Remember, a single package breakage won't sink devel, but lots of aggregated broken packages will -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
