On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 12:21 +1000, David Timms wrote: > Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 10:04 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > >> On 5/26/06, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Nothing stops you from modifying Fedora and including non-free software > >>> for OEM systems. Trademark guidelines do not allow this system to be > >>> called Fedora anymore though. There has been discussions in fedora- > >>> marketing list about this > Thanks, I'll take a look at the archives. > > >> The way I read > >> http://fedora.redhat.com/About/legal/trademarks/guidelines/page5.html > >> > >> An OEM can market a system as Fedora + value addon under certain conditions. > >> > >> <quote> > >> The original Fedora™ code is intact and identifiable at the time of > >> installation and on the media on which the code is delivered; > >> > >> a) > >> The patches are provided independent of the original Fedora™ code and > >> are identifiable on the media on which the code is delivered; > >> </quote> > >> > >> I read this to mean that when an OEM system is delivered/marketed what > >> comes in Fedora and what the OEM is providing as a value addon are > >> clearly delineated. So in the case of media, the OEM addons are on > >> seperate media than the Fedora software. > Would an OEM need to supply the Fedora DVD and their addons install > media even when the hardware has no CD/DVD drive ? Would a required > separate network install server (ie ks over ftp) suffice ? [snip] I think this discussion belongs to fedora-marketing list. Rahul -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
