> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >> No, I don't think that we should do that ATM -- or are there any *good* >> reasons for it? And did somebody check if that combination even works? It does work. >> And in any case: Just copying the i386 version over to the x86-64 repo >> because the maintainer couldn't fix it for x86-64 on it's own is the >> wrong approach IMHO because then we might have a bunch of i386 packages >> in the x86-64 soon just because maintainers were to lazy to fix their >> stuff (or find someone interested in x86-64 to fix it). >> I *have* looked into getting this fixed for x86_64. I have been part of the freenx/nx project since 2004, and no one has successfully ran this on x86_64. I'm told that nxagent is not 64-bit safe, and that fixing it would require somewhat of a rewrite. I also think that it's a little rash to determine that maintainers are lazy because they have a package that does not work on all architectures. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
