On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 08:27 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Another open question would be how this affects us: > http://www.mono-project.com/Assemblies_and_the_GAC#Libraries_with_Unstable_APIs > > It's advocating using .dlls with unstable APIs the same way we normally > use static libraries (including a local copy with the application). It > has all the usual features of a static library scheme but fails to > mention any security issues. Should packages entering Fedora be checked > to make sure they *do not* follow this or are mono .dlls immune to the > security concerns with normal static libraries? I agree this is something that should be decided, before we start getting more mono apps into Extras. /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
