Hi, While packaging, I needed to create a separate documentation package because of its many documentation files. In the PackageGuidelines, we have this: "Any relevant documentation included in the source distribution should be included in the package. Irrelevant documentation include build instructions, the omnipresent INSTALL file containing generic build instructions, for example, and documentation for non-Linux systems, e.g. README.MSDOS. Pay also attention about which subpackage you include documentation in, for example API documentation belongs in the -devel subpackage, not the main one. Or if there's a lot of documentation, consider putting it into a subpackage. In this case, it is recommended to use *-doc as the subpackage name, and Documentation as the value of the Group tag." I think this should be placed in the Package Naming Guidelines too. BTW, I noted that some packages in Extras have a *-docs sub-package instead of *-doc. Talking with Jason Tibbitts in IRC, he said that this is normal. Is there a standard for this or it's up to the packager/reviewer? Thanks for your attention, -- []'s Eitch http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/ "Talk is cheap. Show me the code." - Linus Torvalds -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
