Re: Thoughts about courier-mta packaging?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> There is nothing wrong with starting from the upstream spec.  It will
> have to adhere to the standards though, no flexibility on that.  It
> would be best if upstream could accept the changes you have to make so
> that life is easier.

well, since one of the standards is "no other-distro stuff in the spec,"
that makes courier's incompatible.  My main concern is that it's
designed to build an rpm -- on any rpm-based distro.  I can clean up the
stuff that would annoy rpmlint, possibly the group name (nonstandard),
but I'm not about to maintain it in such a way that I always have to
pull out Sam's non-fedora customizations.

For reference, the file is available at:

http://courier.cvs.sourceforge.net/courier/courier/courier/courier.spec.in?view=markup

-Chris

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux