Re: amaya orphaned?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

> p> Looking at the orphaned packages and it looks like amaya may be
> p> orphaned. Does anyone know if it has or hasn't?
> 
> I recall that it was semi-orphaned, in that the current maintainer
> would prefer not to maintain it.  However, Aurelien did push a
> security update when the issue came up.

Fair enough. 

I hereby claim it in the name of her royal Highness, Princess Beverley
of Haydock and this can of Sprite sitting infront of me.

One question - why is it using the fullsrc rather than just src? (22 vs
8Mb in size)? From what I can see, libwww is already in FC as are the
other bits it links to.

TTFN

Paul
-- 
ich liebe Ashleigh, eins zwei drei 
ich liebe Ashleigh, auf meinem Knee zu hüpfen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux