On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 06:56 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > > IMO, until an official policy is stated otherwise, in this case, I'd > say > don't worry too much about rpmlint's warning... > I'd say take this as official. libexec is fine, and will continue to be used. We need to fix rpmlint to accept it. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
