On Tuesday 27 June 2006 14:37, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 06:56 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > > IMO, until an official policy is stated otherwise, in this case, I'd > > say > > don't worry too much about rpmlint's warning... > > I'd say take this as official. libexec is fine, and will continue to be > used. We need to fix rpmlint to accept it. On x86_64, should /usr/libexec be 64bits or 32bits? -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
