On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 15:23 +0200, Laurent Rineau wrote: > On Tuesday 27 June 2006 14:37, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 06:56 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > > > IMO, until an official policy is stated otherwise, in this case, I'd > > > say > > > don't worry too much about rpmlint's warning... > > > > I'd say take this as official. libexec is fine, and will continue to be > > used. We need to fix rpmlint to accept it. > > On x86_64, should /usr/libexec be 64bits or 32bits? This is a controversal point. Some people want to see $libexecdir multiarch'ed, but most (all?) packages I am aware about to be actively using $libexecdir use it with an architecture corresponding to $bindir. On a single-arch'ed x86_64 $libexecdir would be 64bit, on a single-arch'ed i386 it would be 32bit, on a multiarched, the contents of $libexecdir would have to correspond to the architecture of the binaries in $bindir. Ralf -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
