Christian.Iseli@xxxxxxxx wrote:
michael@xxxxxxxxxxx said:
Should be ignored by the QA script:
lineak_xosdplugin, lineak_kdeplugins, lineak_xosdplugin Are in the
owners.list, however the name differs from the subject of the review
request. Sub the "_" for a "-".
At first, I had a list of BZ tickets for which the script could not determine
the correct package name (file bzId_pkg.txt attached to the
Extras/UsefulScripts wiki page). But I think it was a bad idea: very hard to
maintain. I think the proper way to handle those is to fix the Summary line
of the affected BZ tickets. Which I have done with the lineak* tickets.
Ok, I will fix up those bz reports then.
Re-Review is actually jed, which is in the owners.list
Yup. Fixed the script so that it groks this one too.
Just saw that ;)
kimdaba has been replaced by kphotoalbum, which is in the owners.list
But there still is a kimdaba package with a full devel branch... So
something is wrong somewhere...
Rex is looking into it I believe.
libgsf113 appears to have been removed from cvs, repos and owners.list
This one has been blacklisted now.
Nice!
Thanks
Michael
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
