michael@xxxxxxxxxxx said: > Should be ignored by the QA script: > lineak_xosdplugin, lineak_kdeplugins, lineak_xosdplugin Are in the > owners.list, however the name differs from the subject of the review > request. Sub the "_" for a "-". At first, I had a list of BZ tickets for which the script could not determine the correct package name (file bzId_pkg.txt attached to the Extras/UsefulScripts wiki page). But I think it was a bad idea: very hard to maintain. I think the proper way to handle those is to fix the Summary line of the affected BZ tickets. Which I have done with the lineak* tickets. > Re-Review is actually jed, which is in the owners.list Yup. Fixed the script so that it groks this one too. > kimdaba has been replaced by kphotoalbum, which is in the owners.list But there still is a kimdaba package with a full devel branch... So something is wrong somewhere... > libgsf113 appears to have been removed from cvs, repos and owners.list This one has been blacklisted now. Cheers, Christian -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
